首页> 外文OA文献 >Questioning the Resistance/Aerobic Training Dichotomy: A commentary on physiological adaptations determined by effort rather than exercise modality
【2h】

Questioning the Resistance/Aerobic Training Dichotomy: A commentary on physiological adaptations determined by effort rather than exercise modality

机译:质疑阻力/有氧训练二分法:对努力而非运动方式决定的生理适应性的评论

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper discusses and challenges the current opinion that exercise adaptation is generally defined by modality; resistance exercise (RE), or aerobic exercise (AE). In presenting a strong body of recent research which demonstrably challenges these perceptions we suggest alternate hypotheses towards physiological adaptation which is hinged more upon the effort than the exercise modality. Practical implications of this interpretation of exercise adaptation might effect change in exercise adherence since existing barriers to exercise of time, costs, specialized equipment, etc. become nullified. In presenting the evidence herein we suggest that lay persons wishing to attain the health and fitness (including strength and muscle hypertrophy) benefits of exercise can choose from a wide range of potential exercise modalities so long as the effort is high. Future research should consider this hypothesis by directly comparing RE and AE for acute responses and chronic adaptations.
机译:本文讨论并挑战了当前的观点,即运动适应性通常由情态定义。抵抗运动(RE)或有氧运动(AE)。在提出强有力的最新研究成果以证明对这些看法的挑战时,我们提出了关于生理适应性的另一种假设,这种假设更多地取决于努力而不是运动方式。这种锻炼适应性解释的实际含义可能会影响锻炼依从性的改变,因为消除了锻炼时间,成本,专用设备等方面的现有障碍。在本文中提供证据时,我们建议希望锻炼的健康者和健康者(包括力量和肌肉肥大),可以从广泛的潜在锻炼方式中进行选择,只要付出努力即可。未来的研究应通过直接比较RE和AE的急性反应和慢性适应来考虑这一假设。

著录项

  • 作者

    Fisher, James; Steele, James;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号